Death Penatly should be banned in all countries...
its nothing more then a contradiction.Killing a man for murder only prooves your just a bad as he is.
MitsukaiXxX
#101
Forum archive
MitsukaiXxX · #101Death Penatly should be banned in all countries...Why do you think the you think the death penalty should be banned? If the death penalty was in all countries and was givin if u murdered or raped someone guess what? there would be alot less criminals!!
its nothing more then a contradiction.
MitsukaiXxX · #101Killing a man for murder only prooves your just a bad as he is.All I know is if someone killed the people i hold dear I would kill em if the law didnt work and i would gladly accept any consequencesAlso for the the topic question I believe that if you kill on purpose you can take the consequences no matter what age you are
Rekal188 · #103All I know is if someone killed the people i hold dear I would kill em if the law didnt work and i would gladly accept any consequencesif i were in that place, making him suffer is a sweet revenge. i'll make him bleed until he pleads to just take his life away. revenge is a strong emotion, and for me i can't control it, even if it takes my life.
Rekal188 · #103Why do you think the you think the death penalty should be banned? If the death penalty was in all countries and was givin if u murdered or raped someone guess what? there would be alot less criminals!!So there are allot less criminals in Texas than in any other American State? You are talking crap.The death penalty is murder, pure and simple. Most civilised nations have banned it. Murder by proxy is the refuge of the morally bankrupt coward.
1prinnydood · #107So there are allot less criminals in Texas than in any other American State? You are talking crap.The death penalty is murder, pure and simple. Most civilised nations have banned it. Murder by proxy is the refuge of the morally bankrupt coward.No its not murder it's just getting rid of the sickos that will just murder and rape again
LD64The question here is:the death penalty shouldn't be applied to everyone. i'm not sure as to who, but it's very hard to say...it's really up to the circumstances and the people involved.this is a really hard topic for me to debate.
Was the person aware of their actions at the time of the muder?
crimson089 · #105Should the death penalty be applied to murderers of all ages? Personally I think... no. They should suffer or tortured to death like 10 years or more, death penalty is way too easy for an escape. Pain will surely make them realize what they have done. If they have sincerely changed inside the jail, give them a chance, free them. But in heavy cases like a man has killed 50 people, that's a different story. Tie him up, feed him ants, cut his fingers and feet, pull his eyeballs off, and so on until he lives miserably.I'm all for slow, painful tortures.
leonx3000 · #113I'm all for slow, painful tortures.just make sure he's been proven guilty ;D you really can't do this to the wrong person. you really shouldn't.
Luk7nk4But sending people to prison is more of a gift then punishment to them. It's like this in my country: You murder someone, you get sent to prison. Prisons have more luxury, than homes of some poor people. You can study ANYTHING in prison, get a degree and all for FREE( taxpayer's money).I would say that it's really your country who is at fault here.
Plus you are fed a warm meal three times a day, you get clothes and everything for free.
Cahos Rahne VelozaLife sentence is actually a pretty good alternative to death penalty, but the problem resides with how large your country/Area's penitentiary facility is, if you have a big enough facility why not, but for some who already has an overcrowded facility it might not work, sample enough are my country's correctional facilities which are way over crowded, under staffed & those few staff that remain, some of them are corrupt & can be bought so some convicts can easily get lose.One way to address this would be to stop arresting people for stupid things like possession of pot or other small violations.
christian_o18Follow the Law Of God. He will put judgement to those people who kill another.But when you live in a pluralistic society, which god's law would you follow?
OteupaieconaWow!A lot of the posts here seem to be focused on revenge, like torturing the accused - why would you do such thing to an ACCUSED? that's not even lawful.
A lot of the posts here seem to be focused on revenge, like torturing the accused.
Would this bring back the person who was killed, or make the rape victim forget about what happened?
I would be for the death penalty if we could always be 100% sure the person is guilty.Unfortunately, most of the time we can't.
And death penalty simply to remove these threats from harming anyone again.Not torturing them for revenge, i think that's just childish.
Do you really think someone will not murder because someone else got tortured?
Is the crime rate any lower in Iran or North Korea than it is in the USA or Canada?
What if we focused more on ways to prevent people from committing crimes, rather then focusing on how to punish them?
Things like reducing the poverty line, providing better education, etc?I would say that it's really your country who is at fault here.
Why give prisioners the chance to get a free degree, and not free citizens?
Maybe if they had the chance to get an education, instead of living in the streets, they would not have ended up in prison.
Also, it seems like people in your country struggle to get three meals a day and clothes for their bodies.No wonder they resort to a life of crime.Who's really to blame here?
We like to sit on our high chairs and judge others.
But just walk a mile in their shoes...then you really might know what it's like to sing the blues.(Everlast reference :) )One way to address this would be to stop arresting people for stupid things like possession of pot or other small violations.
At least here in my country it's one big reason why prisons are so overcrowded.But when you live in a pluralistic society, which god's law would you follow?
If you are referring to Yahweh (the Judeo-Christian god) do you think we should stone to death a woman who was raped in a city, while allowing a father to sell his daughter into slavery?
I know this is off-topic, but come on people, we should follow the law of men as a society.If as an individual, you believe in a certain god and in his laws, follow them.But don't try to make them societal laws.No...It's not.
Revenge is childish, not torture.That's just stupid.Don't really know what you're trying to say here.- so we're talking about revenge here. ever heard of 'an eye for an eye'? Although many aspects of vengeance resemble the concept of justice, revenge connotes a more injurious and punitive focus as opposed to a harmonious and restorative one. Whereas justice generally implies actions undertaken and supported by a legitimate judicial system, by a system of ethics, or on behalf of an ethical majority, revenge generally implies actions undertaken by an individual or narrowly defined group outside the boundaries of judicial or ethical conduct. The goal of revenge usually consists of forcing the perceived wrongdoer to suffer the same or greater pain than that which was originally inflicted. and for torture, they deserve it. they should have use their heads before doing all those actions. i want to hear your side of which it is childish. - everyone? on punishment? are you kidding, everyone seems to focus on taxes! - heheheh - that Law of God he was talking about was morality, nothing else. he didn't say use it to make Legal decisions. - Well, you seem to like a lot of people.