Back to General Discussion
wikipedia
C
yeah....someone should make a romulation page in wikipedia, that might help traffic :Dor, like my school did, make your own wikipedia....i.e. romulation.net/wiki :D
L
that has been planned for a long time, but we never thought the demand would justify the effort of installing and maintaining it. The forum is only borderline worth the effort.
P
i think having a romulation wikipedia is good at least people would not keep asking the same question over and over again on the forum
N
Romulation.net was mentioned on Wikipedia. But its' been taken off :)
A
I was going to make an article on RomUlation, but I couldn't understand all the necessary guidelines and references and all that other stuff. So I gave up.
B
Every article starts out as a stub (unless it was expertly planned for months before publishing) so I guess it should happen.
S
RomUlation is illegal thus it will not be in Wikipedia, it's not like it will help much either really, links are nofollowed so they aren't worth anything and the links would only stay up for a few hours at most.
B
What's nofollowed? Warez is illegal and it's on Wikipedia. :P
L
nofollowed refers to a tag put into links that stops search engine spiders following them.
R
Is romulation really having trouble with traffic? How many visits did we loose over that stupid law thing?
C
what about romulation.net/wiki?
N
yea thats' how it should be done, like Azureus/Wiki
S
Relys · #10Is romulation really having trouble with traffic? How many visits did we loose over that stupid law thing?
We went from 25.000 to about 12.000 a day, we're backup to 16.000 a day now with 19.000 on the weekends. Our max ever was 36k a day.
B
Was the 36k before or after the stupid law thing?
L
before we got shut down.
N
whats about the future of RomUlation.net? will this kind of thing happen again?
L
who knows?
Showing posts 1–17 of 17 · This discussion is archivedBack to top