N
iTz JaakeYeah, I hate movie games.
They rush the thing and it's generally terrible.
The only exception for movie games would be,
Lego Starwars,
Lego Indiana jones and batman,
Lego Harry Potter.
The Lego movie franchise is good, maybe except for Indiana I didn't really enjoy that but yeah ;)
Some movie games are crappy, most are extremely mediocre (that includes Harry Potter, Transformers and Avatar), and rarely some are gold (Chronicles Of Riddick, Spiderman 2, Goldeneye, Aladdin, X-Men: Wolverine)
There's more than I listed of course.
N
Aladdin was a good game, the cave of wonders was a pretty hard level. i think games of movies suck largely because the movies themselves sucked.
N
Replying to #42
Sometimes, although in the case of Chronicles of Riddick, the game was about a million times better than the movie.
Oh yeah, I finally saw Avatar, what a load of shit.
N
Replying to #43
it was like that jungle bit in star wars where somehow koalas manage to take down the empire with logs and stones... only worse.
N
Replying to #44
A lot worse. Avatar did not need to be 3 hours either. I remember watching Fern Gully and thinking that was a nice length.
G
I think you needn't to buy. Here c=you can find and download them:
games-engine.com
T
What about the ghostbusters game that came out not too long ago. It wasn't an exact replica of the movie, but it was based off it, and it was pretty awesome