Back to Site Support

Weird chat filter

FuryFlameOP
#1
Hey, I just tried to post a comment with the word "wouldn't", and it said using the ' was chat language, and I had to remove it.How is wouldn't chat language? It's a perfectly normal word.
markswan
#2
I didn't know that there is a filter for the comments that omits "chat language"...
Are you sure that that didn't happen in your mind?
Unless by "It" you mean one of the moderators.
TirithRR
#3
No, there is an SMS Language filter. It is point based if I remember correctly, and any comment over so many points is triggered and the warning is displayed. But I believe you can submit it again if you feel it was unjustly triggered and it will go through. It's more of a warning to let potential excessive SMS language users know the rules.
FuryFlameOP
#5
TirithRR · #3No, there is an SMS Language filter. It is point based if I remember correctly, and any comment over so many points is triggered and the warning is displayed. But I believe you can submit it again if you feel it was unjustly triggered and it will go through. It's more of a warning to let potential excessive SMS language users know the rules.
That makes sense. It's certainly working as a deterrent, it made me review my post. Next time I'll just click submit though.Thanks for clearing things up.
Seph
#6
It's not as simple as that, almost, but not quite. See to the left of the submit button there is a checkbox: "Skip the chat-language check".Three guesses as to what that does, and the first two don't count. :)
markswan
#7

Replying to #6

I may just be stupid; but i don't see that checkbox.
The "Post" box is the one on the left "Preview" is in the middle and "Spell Check" is to the right...
I possibly just have it disabled or something though.
Unless you're calling the "Preview" "Submit" and that was a joke about people not self-filtering their posts...
Am i just being lame?
tehuber1337
#8

Replying to #7

You're just being lame. This discussion refers to game comments rather than the forum.
Showing posts 1–8 of 8 · This discussion is archivedBack to top