Back to Debates
war, is it necessary??
G
clyffe28I'll just stress this even more........the true cause of WW2 was the invasion of poland and not the bombing of pearl harbor as many people think it is ..... the bombing of pearl harbor was the cause why USA joined the war against the axis powers just like USA joined WW1 because of the sinking of the Lusitania
I realise that, but I'm talking before Poland was invaded, the allies kept giving Hitler more and more treaties every time he broke one and invaded a country. Poland was just the straw that broke the donkey's back
C
allied thought they could appease hitler so they just let him take any land he wants thinking he should be satisfied and then stop his invasion ................. and not many treaties were signed during WW2
L
the allies were not ready for war, they needed time to build their forces or Hitler would have walked over them.
A
TBH i think war is absolutely necessary in this time of over population. Something has to cut as down,I mean if its not us then nature will do it for us (anyone who knows of population curves knows this). But that takes time, war does it pretty much instantly and things need to be done now. Yeah so what thats not the nicest things to say but tis true.
C
Its a cruel way to decreas population but before we should result to war should't we dicipline ourselves. Soldiers die because we keep multiplying so in the future even a war could not affect the rapid growth of population
I
man is the most intelligent being on earth but here misunderstandings still happed but have you ever heared of animals declaring war? we should be ashamed
A
Replying to #66
no but animals arent stupid enough to mass over populate themselves, and when they do nature sorts it out (once again the population curves). Nature doesnt sort our population out enough because we think that we are above nature and modify it as much as we can to keep ourselves alive.
L
iceredaph32 · #66man is the most intelligent being on earth
Define intelligent.
I
the way we understand better than animals, the sense of responsibility
L
Animals are perfectly capable of an equal level of understanding. Check this video:http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xr1pWzoLvT8Why did the wild lioness not attack the humans? why did she let one of them pet her? Because she understood that those humans were old friends of her mate.Why did Elsa Adamson not attack her parents' servant when he touched the body of her first kill? Because she understood that he was trying to help her get it out the river, that he was not taking it away from her. Why did she let him cut it's throat after she had killed it? because she understood that his religious beliefs required that its throat was cut before it was eaten.Why did she take her wild born cubs back to her parents as she was dying? because she knew they couldn't look after themselves, and she knew her parents would care for them. She had a responsibility to her cubs, and she knew she was dying and unable to help them any longer, so she passed the responsibility over to her human parents before she died.intelligence is a concept invented by humans to 'prove' that they are superior.
B
wow heart warming show
L
Replying to #71
Not a show, real life. happened in the 80s
B
why did george get killed who the f*ck killed him
I
ok I change my defenition on intelligenceIntelligence is the power to change the world an make it a better place
L
bhatooth · #73why did george get killed who the f*ck killed him
armed robbers, he was trying to protect a german tourist. Kenyan government let the army loose in the reserve and they were arrested two days later.
but this is getting off topic.
I
ok back to topica war greatly decreases population but what good is it when we just keep on multiplying so in the end we just have to have dicipline and not resort to any violence such as wars
C
thats right there are other ways of keeping the population from exploding
I
like what?
C
for example we might require mother who have atleast 3 children to have an operation which will disable their potency of giving birth thus slowing the birthrate and having stable families and decreas families who suffer from poverty because they have 12 or more children to support
G
The only problem with that is that people would campaign for the right to choose to have as many children as they wanted. Unless it was a dictatorship, the government would probably yeild to their demands. If it was a dictatorship, then it'd probably lead to rebellion in most countries. Yay a war, everybody wins...
Showing posts 61–80 of 170 · This discussion is archivedBack to top