Forum archive
getbuck21The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable in his environment. The wing was much too small for the bird to fly. Why would a bird evolve a wing that was useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary natural selection concept that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations improving a wing that was useless? The theory of evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage and the opposite from natural selection. According to natural selection the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers. According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees. The wings became arms and a new species was developed.Fail, the wings got better as they were mutations, if you look at chickens they can glide a little and their jump is increased. You sir are the laughable
nex26 · #41The universe is a 3D doughnut in a 4D world. No I'm not tripping.. it's pretty much accepted, if you go to the far right you will pop up on the left hand side, the same with top and bottom ala Pacman.. wappa wappa!
CloudBoy101Let's all try something new. Instead of giving someone's theory on the matter, try using your own (this includes myself). No more 'theory' talk unless it's your theory. I don't care what someone else thinks, I care what Romulators think :)LMAO! happy now Cloudboy101!You asked for everyone's personal ideas & this is what you get ;DAs for myself, being influenced more by Science fiction rather than Science fact, I believe the Universe is infinitely finite, what this means is yes it may be infinite in size/scale but surely it should have a certain "fixed" size/volume. And yeah, I also believe in infinite multiverses where each one is different based on a finite set of infinite variables, heck by choosing to do this rather than another we ourselves create infinite finite permutations of one outcome.