They seek attention then.*I just watched a video of a Terrorist ******** a helpless hostage, it's demoralizing.
-Needed to post it, I still can't get it out of my head.
Blade5406
#61
Forum archive
Back to Debates
No, it is because they want to make things better. What is better in their minds may be different to what some think is better, this is why talking and discussing and explaining can help. It helped in Northern Ireland, things are far from prefect but things are so much better.
[/quote]Killing innocents is never a way to make things better. Whatever about killing/destroying military targets, civilians should never be put in the firing line to call attention to your cause.
Terrorist: Do they have Human Rights?
dhanash
#62
its because of their society, they never caught a chance to see what they are doing is really bad and wrong, because they were told its not!
1prinnydood
#63
No, it is because they want to make things better. What is better in their minds may be different to what some think is better, this is why talking and discussing and explaining can help. It helped in Northern Ireland, things are far from prefect but things are so much better.
dhanash
#64
well then you should not take away their rights as a human being......
1prinnydood
#65
I agree
dhanash
#66
good so is this over yet? or there needs to be more arguing?
damanaliOP
#67
Just because you two agrees doesn't mean its everyone's answers.
dhanashdid they really chose to do those stuff?? did they had a choice?? who guided them?? weren't they misguided?Yes, they did. Yes, they had. Logic, reasoning, and curiosity. Some, but they had the the reasoning to know what is good and what is bad.
dhanashbut its not their fault....... don't you see.... they never had the chance to see or feel what is good...What terrorist are you talking about? Real-life terrorist, or some game terrorist, or even a robot-type terrorist? I never heard of a terrorist that is forced to do terroristic acts. Mostly, they are volunteers and even have radical member that will do anything to achieve their goals. Maybe in the military, yes, cause they have this, shoot first, ask later policy.
Loonylionit is their fault. they made a concious decision to carry out the act.Yes. unless they can prove that opium is used to recruit and drugged their members.
dhanash · #64well then you should not take away their rights as a human being......taking their rights is not revenge, its called justice. To uphold law and order it must be done. Unless, you are a anarchist or just likes chaos, then terrorist actions are justified.
gaynorvader
#68
1prinnydoodWhich part?[quote author=1prinnydood"]"gaynorvaderwould class the troubles in the north differently as the IRA at the time were attacking military targets and so weren't terrorists until recently when they started attacking civilian targets.This is incorrect.
No, it is because they want to make things better. What is better in their minds may be different to what some think is better, this is why talking and discussing and explaining can help. It helped in Northern Ireland, things are far from prefect but things are so much better.
[/quote]Killing innocents is never a way to make things better. Whatever about killing/destroying military targets, civilians should never be put in the firing line to call attention to your cause.
dhanash · #64well then you should not take away their rights as a human being......We already do take away one of their rights; freedom. We take this from anyone who breaks one of our laws. This is a ridiculous system as killing someone has pretty much the same repercussions as taking illegal drugs. Where's the justice in that? Not only that, but in many cases people are faced with a choice where their life could be improved by committing a crime, how does that make sense? I'm not advocating the death penalty, as that is a pointless punishment, but I do believe that anyone who commits extreme crimes against a fellow human should be made to suffer. If that shortens their life so be it.
dhanash
#69
guess you don't see it the way i do
redoperator
#70
freedom can only go so far, without limits it'll lead to anarchy which will lead into chaos, we take away power to protect themselves/others/ourselves. ok, would you give a 5 year old a colt .44? no you wouldn't. you are exercising boundries, to protect...if a law is broken, they have no right to walk away free. in this case... the rights of the many go before the rights of the few
dhanash
#71
so its all about sacrifice eh?
redoperator
#72
... no it's about compromise in the premise on the fact in which "treat thy neighbor well, and he won't stomp your roses"
dhanash
#73
well...... im saying they shouldnt violate their human rights though..... do anything but that
gaynorvader
#74
How can you punish them without violating their human rights?
redoperator
#75
easy... send them off into multiple barren planets (with earthlike conditions) with really old technology and let all criminals duke it out and create a civilization therelol its like planet australia-1500ad / starcraft
Loonylion
#76
Name a planet that is capable of sustaining life and is close enough to reach in a human lifetime?
redoperator
#77
mars we leave them there to build their own civilization and let them duke it out, then when all is settled earth comes in and takes it for "bettering humanity"
Loonylion
#78
mars cannot support life.
dhanash
#79
Mars probally can't support Earthling lives, but if there is other organisms living out there we shouldnt be looking for how we survive... since they could have a different way of breathing, eating and everything else......
Loonylion
#80
it needs to be able to support human life otherwise it cant be used as a prison camp.
Showing posts 61–80 of 118 · This discussion is archivedBack to top