A
onivan69There might be the hype for StarCraft 2, along with the not-so-bright fanboys out there. What I can't just stand is the need to milk from it.I am a long StarCraft player, Ive played only in local tourneys, not always being the better and stuff. Yes I do own a valid and legit CD Key and RARELY go on B.Net, which sucks because of the power players and hackers.There is at least 50% of people like me, who like StarCraft not for being the hype it was 10 years ago, but the SOCIAL game in which you could go in with your friends and have a good time, along with the heavy campaign story line.StarCraft and StarCraft: BroodWar will ALWAYS be better than SC2: WoL NO MATHER WHAT ANYONE SAYS. The latter won't have nothing else than just... the temporary hype. It will NEVER fit in the shoes BroodWar is still USING, being the king of asian e-sports and I do hope asian people will never switch to SC2 to compete.SC2 is just a sorry shadow of SC on steroids, and will die sooner than everyone expected. Just wait and see.That bias being put, your comparation between a RTS and a FPS game is totally dumb, being none the point of comparation between them, your whole opinion and the purpose of existance for this thread is null and void. In other words: GO BAWWW SOMEWHERE ELSE, allkratos.Thank you.
Starcraft 2 will kill Starcraft and BW in the competitive arena. Just wait and see.
I like you kratos.You're a funny guy.
T
Replying to #42
inorite? Master troll in action.
Natewlie · #42I like you kratos.You're a funny guy.
I am trying to defend that Starcraft 2 should get a better score than WoW: Lich King from some sites. It seems that Gamespot is the only reasonable site these days.
IGN is so stupid that they gave a lot of games like MW2 a 9.5, War of Cybertron a 9.0 yet in truth Sc2 is leaps and bounds in quality.
You're right in the sense that people should judge based on quality rather then opinion. But that's where you're wrong too.
The game's quality is dependent on different people, and how they think of the game. If someone likes the game, someone hates it, there isn't much point in burning the hater's family, because it's always how they feel.
N
allkratos · #44I am trying to defend that Starcraft 2 should get a better score than WoW: Lich King from some sites. It seems that Gamespot is the only reasonable site these days.
IGN is so stupid that they gave a lot of games like MW2 a 9.5, War of Cybertron a 9.0 yet in truth Sc2 is leaps and bounds in quality.
As always, you're a classic jokester and I laugh hysterically.
After reading everything, I'm scared that watching Arrested Development won't give me as hardily of a laugh.
You top ultra sometimes.
Replying to #46
So you do not believe Starcraft 2 is more polished than War of Cybertron? Or Modern Glitchfare 2? WOW. I do not know what's your definition of quality.
I don't base quality by its level of polish.A piece of shit can be polished but it's still shit.
That's what Starcraft 2 is.
J
yep it is the shoe that counts not the polish
A
Natewlie · #48I don't base quality by its level of polish.
So what? Genre? How could a genre be more quality than others? Genre is not something quantifiable or calculate-able.
Starcraft 2 is not just polish but it is a super quality game top to bottom.
Modern Glitchfare 2 on the other hand has many flaws especially the exploitable online mode.
Not to say Sc2 has no flaw. It does when comparing its writing to superior-written game like Mass Effect 2 but it is expertly made in other areas. Modern Glithfare 2 should have been an 8.5 if even Sc2 is 9.0 on IGN.
It is the person who wear the shoe count and not the shoe or polish ;D
A
Natewlie · #48I don't base quality by its level of polish.A piece of shit can be polished but it's still shit.
That's what Starcraft 2 is.
So in your opinion Sc2 is shit? Crazy. You clearly dislike RTS genre or you are just a CnC 4 fangirl who can't accept that is the shittiest shit ever.
Starcraft 2 is no shit. It has not only polish but it has variety and strong components.
i dont a game that took that long must be epic
N
allkratos · #50So what? Genre? How could a genre be more quality than others? Genre is not something quantifiable or calculate-able.
You're funny.
I didn't bring up genre, I base quality on the quality of the game itself, this includes everything. Graphics, gameplay, audio, story and how fun it is to me.
Number scores are flawed because the numbers being compared are simply different opinions or different games. To compare them would be comparing opinions which means almost nothing objectively. That being said your opinion on the game Starcraft 2 is total fanboyism and it's hilarious that you're calling someone else one. Once you have Blizzard's dick out of your mouth, you are then able to contribute your ideas coherently and positively towards the community.
allkratos · #52So in your opinion Sc2 is shit? Crazy. You clearly dislike RTS genre or you are just a CnC 4 fangirl who can't accept that is the shittiest shit ever.
Starcraft 2 is no shit. It has not only polish but it has variety and strong components.
Rofl.
Replying to #54
Therefore you are just an RTS hater. Also Blizzard> EA sucks ball.
Replying to #56
IT is a fact that EA sucks.
You just do not like RTS, ain't you?
You based quality on sounds, graphics, gameplay.
Well those are what we call as polish.
Replying to #57
Your definition of both the word fact and polish are quite humorous and will keep me laughing right until the morning when I wake up.
Replying to #58
Polish is those components that you mentioned like audio, graphics, U.I and so on.
Also Dante's Inferno sucks and CnC 4 is absolutely terrible and NFS sucks and Halo: Reach will hold the crown of FPS not Medal of Honor: Modern Warfare clone.
Post Merge: [time]1280993053[/time]
Thats the real shoe polish ;D
