Cahos Rahne VelozaBeing religious & having a religion are two different things:Having a religion is being a part of & believing in a religionBeing religious, which by the way IS the topic of this discussion is being passionate about something to the point that "that something" is all that matters to you. Like being a part of a religion, say Christianity, you believe in Christianity's teachings & follow its cannons, weither blindly or half inquisitively, that's being religious. This also applies to anything outised the realm of theology itself, you could be a religious perfectionist, but to that effect religious becomes obsessive, same with cleanliness, you could be religious with hygeine or house keeping but then this translates to obsessive compulsive behaviour.{1}So in effect, though you never let people in, & love to piss people off with your abusive posts, you are just being a religious atheist, you don't believe in any theological construct & you keep harassing people for it.{2}What if religious people turn the tables & start picking on you, how would you feel? That is if you can feel anything at all, after all emotions are an extention of the human soul & since you don't believe in souls, therefore you have no emotions 8) {3}And what DO religious people get out of "believing in something"? Hope. Hope for something better, we don't vecessarily cling to our beliefs as if we'll die if we stop believing, instead we believe because we are hoping for a better future. And it may amuse you that we believe in the unrealistic, atleast we believe in something, unlike you, when you die, you're just like an obsolete piece of junk that rusts & decays after being discarded, but worse, you just lay there decaying, dying believing in nothing while the maggots & other decomposers feast on your lifeless decaying matter. We too may suffer the same fate, but atleast we believe in God, Allah, Buddha, Marduk or even Satan himself & that's good enough reason to us to keep on living.
I'm still waiting for an actual argument to be presented.
Or perhaps some evidence that any religion is slightly true (as claimed by Cj).
Or a list of reasons that any religion deserves respect.
This topic is about being religious in the 'belief on faith' sense.
Actually it was about a movie, but the topic drifted.
Saying that I'm being a 'religious atheist' by making actual claims (I haven't attacked anyone; everything I've said is valid) is entirely pointless.
So instead of censoring, calling me a 'basher', or 'an atheist', or 'offensive', why not actually REPLY to what I'm saying.
Stop sidestepping things.
Jesus Fucking Christ =_=
Notes:
(1) - If I were trolling you'd know. Simply because people
get pissed at my posts doesn't mean it was my intention. Although really, I don't care who gets offended at my posts, because hurt feelings are not a valid rebuttal to any presented argument.
(2) - Go for it. I don't get offended by anything other than horrible logic. Emotions are a construct of the brain made possible by chemical release due to outside stimulus and other factors. What evidence is there that a soul even exists? Unless you mean 'emotions' as ideas and not feelings, in which case my argument remains identical. What evidence is there that a soul even exists, and furthermore, why should anyone believe that emotions are extensions of this 'soul' when we can provide scientific evidence that they are constructs of the brain?
(3) - This is what you've just said:
Religious people are better because they think good stuff might happen. If it doesn't and they are disappointed by their expectations, well, at least they deluded themselves. When I die, I'll rot like every other scrape of organic matter on this planet. And even though you will as well, at least you did thinking you wouldn't.
Really? That's something you're proud of? Self-delusion because you don't have the capacity or personal strength to see the world for what it truly is? Some ancient guys wrote a book and you're willing to spend your entire life living by it even if it isn't true simply so that you can 'be happy'?
But oh no, I can't be happy living. I can't enjoy living, live with the freedom to make my own decisions based on my own brain-work. And when I die, I won't be afraid because I'm not scared of some arbitrary sky-daddy judging me for that perfectly natural (and scientifically understood) things I did in privacy? Lol to you, sir. Lol to you.
[quote author=grimsim1]Because there is no argument to be presented here. No one can prove religion exists. But people still believe in it because there must be a purpose to their life. We are not all a piece of meat that just happens to breathe and think. There must be something out there after life. If you don't believe in anything, then you have nothing to really live for. If you have nothing to believe in your life is meaningless and hence you really don't serve a purpose. As Cahos said, emotions are really important for your soul and whether you like it or not, you have motions too. It's not as simple as you just being an individual with nothing setting you apart from anyone else. We think and have a conscious for a reason and that ties in with religion because it is that religion that governs how you live your life and how it will proceed after your death, and who are you to say that that is not the way it is going to happen?!?!
Oh and why does religion deserve respect? Because it stems from the person themselves believing in their faith, and you must respect that person as it is the right thing to do. If you don't believe in their religion then don't spend your life trying to disprove it. Move on and respect the fact that every person is entitled to their opinion and their beliefs and that is what you should be respecting in essence.[/quote]Religion does exist, I assure you.
Why can't we all just be pieces of meat that breath and think? Because that makes you sad? Sorry, but that's not logically reasoned. Simply because something upsets you does not effect it's truth value or validity.
I'm all for freedom of belief.
However, the respect of someone's religious freedom does not mean they're exempt from criticism. I believe that Scientology members should be legally able to believe what they please. but that doesn't mean I can't point out the fallacies and lulz in their beliefs. If your logic were valid, then mental patients should not be committed because we have to 'respect their beliefs'.
Who am I to say it won't happen that way?
I'm not saying it won't happen. The possibility exists that ANY religion is 100% true. However, that doesn't mean I'll refrain from criticizing people who believe something simply because they
want it to be true. Allowing for the fact that anything is possible is fine. But actually committing to something just because you happen to like that particular dogma, or just so happen to have been raised in a religious family, is the ultimate forfeit of your rational brain and deserves no respect.