Demetious · #1McCain
Pro - He will make a great Commander in Chief, and Sarah Palin adds executive experience to the ticket.
Demetious · #5Sarah Palin has been a little more than just a Governer which already puts her above Obama in experience. She was on the city council for 4 years, mayor for 6 years, has chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Committie for over a year, and has been a governer for two years. Thats 13 years of Executive decision making. Board members at that level and executive positions do not allow for the position of "present" which Obama has clearly voted around 130 times. Sure Obama has voted with the Senate way more than 130 times but the votes he voted yes for are unanimous desicions on things like, recognizing some special day or commemorating an event somewhere.
Hahahaha,
Sarah Palin is more of a pro to the Democrats, not McCain. Palin's executive experience (oh wow, 2 years of governorship, that's not even close to a full-term!) is riddled with underhanded bullshit that is now biting her in the ass. Not only do you have the
Troopergate Scandal which is becoming an inflated blister, and the records of her
Bridge to Nowhere project which became a huge political blunder of hers, but you also have the records of how Palin
underhandedly governed Alaska by leeching off the rest of US via taxes.
Yes, Sarah Palin leeched off American taxpayers to balance her state budget, which pisses me off. The portion of my paycheck that gets taxed is supposed to go to the US Government only, NOT to the state of Alaska just so that they can cover their own ass. Let me ask you this, is THAT the kind of person you want serving in the White House?
Demetious · #5Republicans (majority) Believe the glass is half full. They see America as a great country with many opportunities. I know I could be a millionaire if I really put my mind to it. I could literally buy and sell crap to people on Ebay and become rich. It's all about self discipline and keeping a positive attitude. They are also for power to the people and very little government involvment. They believe in traditional lifestyles where a mother and a father raise children as a family. Many have religious lifestyles and believe in marriage and life.Democrats (majority) Believe that America is a bad place and always needs fixing. Most are hell bent on bringing people who make it down to their level and killing small business in America. They want HUGE government to oversee everything in life and to see how much the government can give them. Democrats seem to think tax hikes big spending solve problems which I disagree with.
Oh ok, so let me get this straight. The United States is facing a huge economic disaster right now, so the majority of Republicans are supposed to play delusional and say "We're not in a recession! What are you talking about?" while the majority of Democrats play 'chicken little' and say "Folks, we're in deep shit!"?
I hope you do realize that
the political scale is spectrum from strong conservatives (reactionaries) to strong liberals (radicals), as opposed to your stereotypical black-and-white perspective. You can also take into account that many Republicans do hold liberal values, as well as many Democrats holding conservative values as well. Why do you think the terms (which seem like an oxymoron) "conservative Democrat" and "liberal Republican" exist?
Back on topic, I'm voting for Obama. Here's why.
I trust Obama with handling my country more than McCain. Obama certainly has more credibility than McCain in terms of the economy (which is my top concern because I don't want this country to face another 'Great Depression'). In regards of taxes, I don't give a shit. I would rather face a high tax than see my total assets and savings being worth almost nothing. And besides, I know both Obama and McCain will tax us up our ass anyways due to the frailing economy, so all those statements that you've heard from them regarding taxes is bullshit.
Regarding foreign policy, Obama's approach of "speaking softly and carry a big stick" is certainly a more better approach than McCain's aggressive approach. The United States has enough enemies already, and we certainly do not need any more. You can argue about how McCain's staunch and aggressive stance is somehow a more better attitude to defend the United States, but I certainly am positive that McCain would put this country in a more grave danger with his aggressive policy, especially with Sarah Palin's judgment on Russia (watch Palin's interview with Charles Gibson.)
And speaking of judgment, that is one of the things I look for from the President of United States along with character and integrity. Obama has so far demonstrated great character and judgment. Sure, he requested lots of earmarks, but at least he was open and honest about it, and
none of them were as ridiculous as Palin's. McCain has great character as well, but unfortunately his judgment as of late has been poor: McCain jumped the ship from his maverick position to supporting Bush 90% of the time, has flip-flopped on his stances on certain issues, ESPECIALLY the economy (not to mention McCain admitted that
he is weak on the economy.) With that said, McCain's choice of VP is a total flop as Palin only offers just a female face, but almost no credibility to his ticket whatsoever. I have no clue as of why McCain didn't pick Romney as his VP since Romney could help McCain's ticket with strong economic credentials PLUS, Romney unlike Palin served a full term as Governor. Obama unlike McCain chose his VP wisely as Biden can cover Obama's main weakpoint which is foreign policy.