Ok im surprised that this aint been made already, and i know i wasnt even alive when the Lockerbie bombings occured but i do know that releasing a mass murderer on grounds of compassion is definitely unfair. The fact the Scottish Government released a terrorist, who killed 270 people on grounds of compassion is not only sick, its also extremely unfair on everyone that took part in the prosecution of this tosser.
He was released under the order of Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskil on grounds of compassion, he has severe prostate cancer and has only been given 3 months to live. The head of the FBI, the president of ths USA, the PM of the UK and many more important figures have expressed outrage at this.
The British givernment has said they had nothing to do with his release but have admitted to requesting that Libyan PM Col Gadaffi act "with sensitivity" on the issue. So what does the guy go and do? He gives the convicted mass murderer a hero's welcome and thanks the British and Scottish governments for making "the right decision". The British government have insisted they had nothing to do with his release and the US have criticised the Scottish Parliament for making such a "stupid and harmful decision".
Now will this give terrorists round the world comfort in knowing if they attack contries that allow "compassion" be shown, they may be able to see their family before they die? Will this increase terrorist attacks?
Now what do you think of this, was releasing the lockerbie bomber a good thing or should he have been left to rot?
branrafOP
#1
