How do you think is the most effective way to stop war?

bhatoothyep its much less destructive

not necessarily.

gaynorvaderSome good old global brainwashing should do the trick, or some genetic engineering maybe...

Most effective way is to destroy all remnants of the human race.

Replying to #82

Exactly what genetic engineering would achieve! ;)

Replying to #83

Hahaha! I like this idea. ;)

Just watch Gundam Wing they had a great way to end all war. Cause war so horrible that when the dust settles no one would ever want to have war again.

Replying to #85

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I

BeaverGod · #85Just watch Gundam Wing they had a great way to end all war. Cause war so horrible that when the dust settles no one would ever want to have war again.

Lol, read or watch the sequel, there is still people who wants war. As long humanity still alive, war will never meet its end.

snebbers · #82Most effective way is to destroy all remnants of the human race.

the simplest still the best

I have an even better way of stopping war.
Politicians should go fight the wars they start, i wonder if they would be so keen after 6 month on the front line?

i know the best way to.... just put a BIG BOMB inside of earth and when someone making war *BOOOOM*

Give all countries nuclear weapons :) Either everyone'll be too afraid to go to war or the world ends, either way it'd end all war.

Replying to #90

there wouldn't be no EITHER way, the world would end within a year

Replying to #91

no, WE would end within a year, the world would still be there.
you cant stop war

I still think my first answer was the best - deterrants.

... maybe if we had one giant sexpile we can stop war because we'll be to busy having sex

msg2009 · #91there wouldn't be no EITHER way, the world would end within a year

You think? Quite a few countries have nukes at the moment and so far no nuclear war

Its easy just surrender

gaynorvader · #95You think? Quite a few countries have nukes at the moment and so far no nuclear war

might that be because the countries most likely to use them don't have them?

Replying to #97

What, like India, Pakistan, and North Korea? Perhaps Iran too? I'm curious as to your definition of "countries most likely to use them".

north korea for a start. India and pakistan both have nukes.

it depends on the extent you want to go i think nukes are easiet to stop single fought wars against countries without nukes and countries with nukes thats a different story i dont know how to stop a nuke but if i had to i would send an emp and hopefully an emp will disable it then allowing us to nuke the hell out them