Former JonBenet murder suspect trying to form a "child sex cult"

You read right, folks.http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/37465020/ns/today-today_people/The next link is slightly more disturbing.http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-01/john-mark-karr-after-a-jonbenet-confession-are-their-other-secrets/3/

She said she began to look for little girls to bring to him. “It seemed like a good idea at the time,” she told Curry. “He was so persuasive. He’s very manipulative. It’s a family that he had wanted, and I didn’t want to get in the way of something he wanted.

^ Really? Really? Even if you're being manipulated by this sick pervert I don't see how the words "little girls" and "sex" sound like a great family, or even a good idea. In my opinion, anyway.

“If you cost me my little girls, I will hunt you down and kill you,” was one message she said he sent her. Another read, “I only kill the girls I love the most.”

Before and after pictures:
- - -God, people like this...
After hearing about this the other day and reading more on it now I want to just scream. I don't say how I want strangers to die, but oh man... Pedophiles/rapists/murderers are a huge exception.
These people make me sick. And the fact that pedophiles aren't locked up for life pisses me off even more.What tickles these guys pink is just awful.

It always amazes me how twisted people can become...For the whole persuasion thing, maybe Karr didn't necessarily use the words "little girls" and "sex" in the same sentence, but Speigel still should have caught on by then and figured out what he wanted to do, especially if he mentioned a "Kiddie Cult."She also mentioned that she thought there was nothing wrong with his relationships with children, that he "shouldn't be prevented from doing what he loves in a sick way."What. The. Fuck? There's no justification for that statement.And that nonsense about him "just wanting a family" and him being "a victim of his childhood" and all that was clearly bullshit; she definitely should have seen through that.Well, I just hope they can catch this guy before he causes any major damage (from what I've read, it hasn't been confirmed if he did anything flat-out illegal).

Replying to #2

She knew about the sexual relationships he insisted on having, my friend.

I didn't think there was anything wrong with him having sexual relationships with children

On that note, though: You must be pretty fucked up if you think an adult raping a child or even "playing" with a child is as she describes "healthy". Even at her age of 11 when he mentioned this to her.I agree, though! There really is no justification!And well, he was handed over on 2001 charges of having child pornography on a computer, but were dropped when the evidence was discarded. I'm sure if you're going to be charged with that much you're pretty ill just spending a lot of time searching that up. It should have been a warning sign.I hope they catch him, as well. Those bastards helping him out should get in trouble, too. At least to save a few more little girls from these selfish men.

This man is a god for bringing me this much lulz.