'em old classics

thebass32421 Jul 2008 · 19:25 UTC

#21

Depending on where you are in the world Final Fantasies 1-6 (except 3) were either released or rereleased on the PSX, I know I have Final Fantasy Chronicles which consists of Final Fantasy 4 and Chrono Trigger.

insanecrazy0721 Jul 2008 · 19:33 UTC

#22

there's Final Fantasy Anthology too.

anandjones22 Jul 2008 · 04:12 UTC

#23

Which is composed of remakes of I and II I believe.

insanecrazy0722 Jul 2008 · 04:14 UTC

#24

i thought it was V and VI.who knows.

thebass32422 Jul 2008 · 14:09 UTC

#25

Replying to #24

Yep, Origins was I and II, or at least that's how they are in America.

cjdogger22 Jul 2008 · 19:31 UTC

#26

I love FF Anthologies VI it is really awesome! (espescially with my ar and gameshark cheats :P )

insanecrazy0722 Jul 2008 · 20:24 UTC

#27

i have FF anthology on my PSP now.except FF5 is a little buggy when trying to save. (gets all glitchy, have to back out and try again)FF6 runs perfect.

Abbafan197223 Jul 2008 · 16:24 UTC

#28

OP, you must be really young then. I am 36 and am enjoying my DS. Just bought a second one for my kids, cos they keep nicking it off me!Hubby has an XBox, but I really want a Wii!When I was young we had to play with the likes of the Commodore 64 and Sinclair Spectrum et all.

insanecrazy0723 Jul 2008 · 20:01 UTC

#29

so is there even an english version of final fantasy 3 (not 6) prior to the DS remake?that's one i don't have...

Loonylion23 Jul 2008 · 20:18 UTC

#30

Replying to #29

Yes, FF3 was released in Europe

anandjones23 Jul 2008 · 20:21 UTC

#31

Final Fantasy VI is always the name for it, not III, that's the name for the US version. You can barely find it on romsites though, only Japanese versions.

Loonylion23 Jul 2008 · 20:38 UTC

#32

there was both 3 and 6 in Europe, US got 6 and called it 3

Cahos Rahne Veloza23 Jul 2008 · 20:44 UTC

#33

The "official" Final Fantasy 3 (that was recently remade) was a NES (FamiCom) game that was released only in Japan.

waylonn24 Jul 2008 · 19:27 UTC

#34

To many numbers :-[

cjdogger24 Jul 2008 · 19:44 UTC

#35

Loonylion · #32there was both 3 and 6 in Europe, US got 6 and called it 3

So does that mean that Square Enix mixed up the numbers?

thebass32424 Jul 2008 · 19:58 UTC

#36

Replying to #35

Technically Squaresoft did (or were they still Square at that point? I can't remember), they skipped 2, 3, and 5 in America so they released 4 and 6 as 2 and 3 to avoid the numbers skipping and confusing people. Although I don't really see how suddenly jumping from 3 to 7 was any better than skipping around.

cjdogger24 Jul 2008 · 20:01 UTC

#37

Replying to #36

They're confusing, they change their names Square>Squaresoft>Square Enix>? To be continued...
Then they mess around with the titles... What next?

thebass32424 Jul 2008 · 20:03 UTC

#38

Well they started as Square, then they merged with Sunsoft to become Squaresoft, and then a few years ago merged with Enix to form Square Enix just to clarify that.

cjdogger24 Jul 2008 · 20:07 UTC

#39

Replying to #38

Ah.. Their company kept growing and companies merged with them...

Cahos Rahne Veloza24 Jul 2008 · 20:17 UTC

#40

Wait, Square merged with Sunsoft!?I don't think so, because if they did, why were "Eternal Eyes" & "Monster Seed", both for the PSOne released solely by Sunsoft?Also, if that were true, how come, the Looney Tunes games released by Sunsoft like "Looney Tunes B-Ball" for the SNES weren't labeled, Squaresoft if there was such a merger, since these games came out at the same time (or almost) as when Square started using the name "Squaresoft" at around Final Fantasy 4's release or in such titles like Romancing Sa-Ga that were released only in Japan?

Showing posts 21–40 of 49 · This discussion is archivedBack to top